The Battle for Balcombe – The New Front Line in the Fight to Reclaim our Power

IMG_0938(c) Scriptonite

In recent weeks, the sleepy hamlet of Balcombe, West Sussex has become the front line in the battle against not simply Fracking – but our right to have a say in the big decisions that shape our world.  I spent a view days on site, and here is my write up of this extraordinary event.

What is Fracking?

SG3

(c) BBC News

Large reserves of shale gas have been discovered across the UK, mainly in the North.  Hydraulic Fracturing (Fracking) refers to the process whereby water, sand a range of chemicals are blasted at high pressure into shale rocks deep underground to ‘fracture them’, releasing the gas inside, which is then extracted and burned to create energy.

The government introduced a moratorium on the practise in 2011, after the fracking of Preese Hall in Lancashire led to earthquakes of 2.3M in the Blackpool.  It was demonstrated that hydraulic fracturing had caused these earthquakes by firing the high pressure water into seismic faults.

The government has recently ended this moratorium, stating that:

“In the light of the recommendations of a panel of independent experts, of comments received in response to a public consultation, and of the recommendations of an authoritative review of the scientific and engineering evidence on shale gas extraction made by the UK’s science and engineering academies, the Royal Society and the Royal Academy of Engineering, the Secretary of State for Energy has announced the introduction of new regulatory requirements to ensure that seismic risks are effectively mitigated.”

There are plans underway for thousands of new gas wells across the country.  Campaign group Frack Off have put together a map of proposed sites.  Energy firm Cuadrilla have gained planning permission to drill for oil at Balcombe in West Sussex, and drilling has begun.  In fears that this well will eventually become a fracking site, members of the local community and concerned citizens from across the UK have joined in protest.  In many ways Balcombe is the beginning, for supporters and opponents of Fracking alike.  Planning applications are currently live for:

Lancashire County Council 05/11/0431 – In Lancashire Cuadrilla Resources has applied to extend the testing period at the Preese Hall well (the source of the earthquakes) for 12 months. It is unclear when the planning application will be decided.

Vale of Glamorgan Council 2011/00812/FUL – In South Wales, Coastal Oil & Gas Ltd has applied for permission to drill core samples of Limestone shales at the Llandow Industrial Estate. The application has been turned down but the company is appealing.

Bath & North East Somerset Council 12/04304/FUL – UK Methane have applied for permission to test and drill into coal seams in Keynsham, near Bristol.

Why are People Opposed to Fracking?

IMG_0922 (c) Scriptonite

One of the distinguishing features of both the Reclaim the Power and the Great Gas Gala camps in Balcombe, is the range of interest groups present.  There are people drawn from across the range of economic, social and environmental justice movements. While on site, I spoke with supporters of Fuel Poverty Action, Disabled People Against Cuts, UK Uncut, Occupy London, No Dash for Gas and Frack Off, together with many people who had never been a part of any of those groups, or indeed protested at all before.

The key message coming from the camp is that time has come to unite and appreciate the interconnectedness of our struggle.

This makes Fracking is the perfect issue to unite behind, because there is evidence of harm from whichever of these three viewpoints (environmental, economic, social justice) you might most naturally come from.

Our Environment

The government insists that the seismic activity which occurred as a result of the Preese Hall test is highly unlikely to happen again, as it was as a result of firing water into seismic faults rather than inherently the fracking process.  However, a report commissioned by the Department of Energy and Climate Change to review this claim states the following:

“We agree with the conclusion that the observed seismicity was induced by the hydraulic fracture treatments at Preese Hall. However, we are not convinced by the projected low probability of other earthquakes during future treatments. We believe it is not possible to state categorically that no further earthquakes will be experienced during a similar treatment in a nearby well. The analyses failed to identify a causative fault, and detailed knowledge of faulting in the basin is poor. In the present state of knowledge it is entirely possible that there are critically stressed faults elsewhere in the basin. It is possible that a 3D seismic reflection survey could help better characterize faulting within the basin.”

The report also went on to criticize the numeral methods used to model likelihood of such events, and that the government’s proposed acceptable threshold of 2.3M on future seismic activity was far too generous, meaning no activity at all would need to be undertaken by fracking companies to continue the operation.  The report recommends ceasing operations and identifying issues where seismic activity above 0.5M is reached.

But it is not merely earthquakes which are causing concern.  Fracking has also been linked to contamination of drinking water. A recent study, conducted by the University of Texas, discovered Arsenic levels 18 times the safe amount, in US drinking.  Researchers compared data from wells near Fracking sites, and further away, discovering there that the closer samples were taken to the sites, the higher the levels of arsenic, selenium and strontium.   The study contained historical data for levels of these metals and compounds in the areas prior to Fracking and marked notable increases, particularly in the short time period.  They also found the presence of ethanol and methanol.  These do not occur naturally in groundwater, and dissipate quickly when they form, indicating longer term contamination of the groundwater.  The researchers concluded that there is further research required before confirming the safety of the fracking process on drinking water.

This report is by no means isolated.

The Environment Protection (EPA) in the US also found arsenic in private drinking water in Dimock Pennsylvania, and a range of toxic chemicals and gas in Wyoming not only discoloured and tainted tap water but led to residents of the state being advised to no longer drink tap water or shower/bath in an unventilated room.

Eyebrows were raised in the US recently when the EPA abruptly abandoned the multi-million dollar research study based on the pollution in Wyoming.  It announced it would be handing the investigation over to the State of Wyoming, where it will be funded by EnCana, the very company under investigation for causing the contamination. Furthermore, ProPublica reports this forms part of a distinctive back pedal from the EPA who have also:

  • Closed an investigation into groundwater pollution in Dimock, Pa., saying the level of contamination was below federal safety triggers.
  • Abandoned its claim that a driller in Parker County, Texas, was responsible for methane gas bubbling up in residents’ faucets, even though a geologist hired by the agency confirmed this finding.
  • Sharply revised downward a 2010 estimate showing that leaking gas from wells and pipelines was contributing to climate change, crediting better pollution controls by the drilling industry even as other reports indicate the leaks may be larger than previously thought.
  • Failed to enforce a statutory ban on using diesel fuel in fracking.

At the very minimum, significant further study is required before anyone can state with a clear evidence base, that concerns around Fracking and water contamination have been resolved.

Fracking also uses vast amounts of clean water, 4 million gallons of water per well.   To put this in perspective, this is equivalent to the average consumption of a 4 person household for more than three hundred years.  With thousands of wells planned in the South East alone, this creates multiple issues.

Firstly, a significant drain on clean water used for drinking as water companies divert clean water to fracking sites.  Drinking water is a finite resource.  Scarcity, or increased filtration requirements could lead to price increases.

Secondly, the water has to be transported, usually be vehicles, to the fracking sites – increasing traffic on the roads and the carbon foot print of creating the energy.

The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds came out with major concerns about bird populations around fracking sites this week, joining a number of environmental and animal protection groups to challenge the process.  Locals of Balcombe have spoken of the sudden exodus of birds, and wildlife in general from the area since the establishment of the operation.  I can personally attest to the eerie silence.  It was strange to be in the middle of nature and hear not one single bird, and no dawn chorus.

Finally, the end product is a fossil fuel.  Therefore, even if one were able to dismiss or disprove all of the substantial concerns above, you are still left with government and the energy industry investing in fossil fuels when they could and should be investing and developing sustainable, renewable sources.

Our Economy

David Cameron, the UK Prime Minster, wrote an article for The Telegraph this week entitled ‘We Cannot Afford to Miss Out on Shale Gas’.  His argument was heavily weighted on economics, claiming that shale gas exploration (Fracking) would ‘drive down energy bills’.  Cuadrilla themselves have stated categorically that there will be a ‘basically insignificant’ impact on energy bills.

David Cameron continued to claim that the expansion of Fracking would create jobs.  Germany has increased its renewable energy supply to 25% (rising from 7% in just thirteen years) and created 380,000 jobs in the process.  David Cameron claims Fracking could create 70,000.  Even if this were true, it’s a fraction of the jobs created by a diversified, alternative energy market such as Germanys, and it traps the UK in the fossil fuel market preventing the transition to a renewable energy economy.  While Cameron invites us into the dash for gas, he shackles us, holding us back from the dash for sustainable, renewable energy and a new economy.

Our Democracy

The Environment Protection Agency in the US, as we have discussed, is manifestly failing in its duty to be a trusted, independent arbiter of Fracking.  But serious questions are also being raised about the UK’s ability to properly regulate this process.

The line between the public and private interest has become hopelessly blurred. The independent role of government as the arbiter of public interest has been compromised. Here are just a few facts which attest to this issue:

  • Cuadrilla, the firm given approval to operate in Balcombe, is Chaired by Lord Browne.  This same Lord Brown is a sitting peer in the House of Lords, and a member of the Cabinet Office of the UK Government.  He was appointed to the Cabinet Office by Francis Maude….who is the MP for Balcombe.
  • Despite the raft of public health and environmental concerns, the government has resisted all calls for a comprehensive impact assessment or public consultation on fracking.
  • Central government has removed the powers of local authorities (and with it local communities) to approve fracking, or to investigate reports of pollution or contamination related to fracking in their area.  This is entirely contrary to both Coalition parties claims to promote localism and decentralise power from Westminster.

The Parish Council of Balcombe conducted a survey of constituent views on the Cuadrilla plans. As the Council’s blog explains:

“A polling card was delivered to every residence in the Parish (approx. 750 houses) and, when the poll closed on 10th September, 284 polling cards had been returned. 234 (82%) expressed the view that the Parish Council should oppose fracking, 30 that it should not, 16 had no strong views, and 4 polling cards were invalid.”

For those who have serious concerns about the economic and environmental case for Fracking, the process has been highly undemocratic.  Their chosen political representatives garnered their votes promising environmental responsibility and localism – and are instead forsaking environmental concerns for short term, private profits, and overcoming local objections by centralising power. Waiting to vote at the next election will be too late.  Therefore, all formal democratic channels to oppose this action have been exhausted.

Voices from Balcombe

 IMG_0923

(c) Scriptonite

This is what has brought people of all political viewpoints to an agreement that direct action, protest and non-violent civil disobedience is all they have left.  This is the reason for those camp sites at Balcombe.

This week, direct action was the name of the game.  Protesters succeeded in delivering a series of actions against Cuadrilla throughout the day of action on Monday 19th August.  In Lichfield, protesters closed the offices of Cuadrilla HQ by gluing themselves to doors, and dropped a banner from the roof. In London’s Holborn, another group took on Bell Pottinger, the PR firm that represents not only Cuadrilla but the family of Syrian President Assad among other despotic regimes. Even the office of Francis Maude MP of Balcombe was left with a wind turbine blade at the door.

IMG_0975

IMG_0967

(c) Scriptonite

At the Cuadrilla site in Balcombe, a small group locked themselves together at the gate to keep vehicles out.  They were protected by concentric rings of other protesters.  I was present as police once again acted as tax payer funded private security goons on behalf of Cuadrilla – arresting tens of people exercising their right to protest.  Among those arrested were Green MP Caroline Lucas and her son, who along with others, was assaulted by police.

IMG_0985(c) Scriptonite

Elements of the media have made much of a minority opinion against protest from within Balcombe.  Having spent time at the camp and around the village, this is disingenuous reporting.  I found no shortage of local people eager to welcome the camp, in fact many locals were part of the camp, and Balcombe residents lined the road to applaud protesters as they filed through to the camp from the local train station this week.

It is important to remember the significance of this, as Balcombe is a conservative heartland.  This is not the likeliest of town in the country to be mounting a direct action protest.  That alone should send a warning to the rest of the country about just how urgent the need to protest is.

Reclaiming our power to influence the decision which affect our daily lives; how we source of energy, how we treat our most vulnerable, how we protect our civil liberties – this is the battle raging in the UK and across the world, and at Balcombe, we have opened a new front line.

JUST 9 DAYS LEFT TO KEEP SCRIPTONITE DAILY INDEPENDENT! CLICK HERE TO DONATE ANYTHING FROM AS LITTLE AS £1 OR AS MUCH AS YOU LIKE

 

14 thoughts on “The Battle for Balcombe – The New Front Line in the Fight to Reclaim our Power

  1. The overwhelming evidence is that fracking is a toxic environental disaster where it has been pushed through….so……why are we not doing what Germany is doing…that is…using wind,water and solar alternatives and shutting down power stations?…..Because this country has corrupt corporate backers,MP’s,banks,coglomerates and no concience,no care for its citizens.That is why I went to Balcome,that is why I will return.

  2. Pingback: Scriptonite’s Round up of the Week’s News | Scriptonite Daily

  3. A couple of other significant impacts you omit in your piece are
    (1) as already mentioned in a previous comment, what is done with the water and constituent toxic fracking fluids which return to the surface – is it left in “containment” ponds on site, or is it taken away by road, and if so, where to?
    (2) According to the film Gasland 2 a significant proportion of wells leak methane to the atmosphere during the lifetime of the well – something like 5% right away, rising (if I recall correctly!) to up to 50% after the well has been there 30 years. Methane is a highly potent greenhouse gas – 72 times as bad as CO2 in its impact on global warming.

    In its shameless championing of fracking and the companies who want to do it this government has “nailed its colours to the mast” and demonstrates once and for all that it is no friend of the country or its people, only of profit – both corporate and personal for the 1% – and those Mssrs Cameron & Co believe can deliver it.

    • Well said, oztones. Not only do we have a government which looks after the 1 per cent, while chanting that we live in a democracy. They further insult us by ignoring or twisting any evidence which they don’t like.
      No Wonder they are taking strides to disempower the campaigning websites;these are our only hope for opposing that corrupt bunch.

  4. It would indeed appear that this Govt of ConDemNation are behaving as if the UK and it’s inhabitants were actually not a country at all.. They are behaving as if this is a garage sale.. The intrinsic corruption of Westminster and big business skipping hand-in-hand while they plunder our land and loot our hard won human rights, as more of the people of this country are struggling to even feed themselves, is just deplorable…
    Thank-You for bringing to our attention, through your blog, much that “the powers that be” would rather pass unnoticed into Law, or under our radar, or diverted by yet another reality t.v. show… When, oh when will Enough be Enough???

  5. I’ve been following your time at Balcombe on facebook and want to thank you for keeping us fully informed. I’ve been doing my own research into fracking activitiy in this country and I’m dismayed to discover that up here in Scotland it is no better than in England. I discovered the Frack Off Scotland website and then discovered to my shock that I am little more than a mile or so away from a planned borehole to be drilled by Reach Oil and Gas Ltd. Well I assume its ony planned as after a visit to the company website I cannot find any mention of their fracking activitity in Cumbernauld. They have permission to drill the borehole from SEPA so they obviously intend to drill here.

    Prompted by the Frack Off Scotland website I have written to my Westminster MP, my Scottish Parliament MSP and my European Parliament MEP and look forward to their responses. I have also written to my local newspaper to ask them, in light of what is going on in Balcombe, to run another story on the proposed fracking on our doorstep in Cumbernauld. I also intend to contact my local council to voice my objections to fracking in my back yard, asking them to reconsider their involvement. Finally I have offered Frack Off Scotland my time, as a volunteer, to support their campaign in Scotland.

    Cumbernauld is a large and densely populated area only 11 or so miles North East of Glasgow. The environmental impact of fracking would be felt by tens thousands of people in and around Cumbernauld. This country is a relatively small island with precious natural resources which millions of people rely on to survive. To put the country at this level of risk for something that has no real economic value is incomprehensible, irresponsible and downright wrong. If we severly depleat or even destroy our water supplies we run the risk of creating an environmental disaster that we cannot recover from. And what then? How could an island of this size survive without a natural supply of fresh clean water?

    This country is being sold off and run into the ground at an alarming rate. If we don’t do something now to stop this destruction of our way of life we will not survive or have anything to pass on to the generations to come. Well done to everyone who has been to Balcombe to stop fracking, solidarity with you all.

  6. Take a good look at what is happing in the US and Canada on this subject and talk to those groups. Fracking takes vast amounts of fresh water and leaves vast amounts of chemically and mineral waste polluted water, and other ugly stuff. Be very careful of what they tell you, because the only people left holding the bag, is the poor people who live in these affected areas after the wells are finished and done. In the US the wells do not last long so the drill a lot of them, the word wasteland comes to mind.

  7. Pingback: The Battle for Balcombe - The New Front Line in...

  8. The continuing obsessive quest for more sources of fossil fuel is ludicrous in view of the environmental havoc caused, both at the point of extraction and in the end use when there are alternatives available.

Leave a Reply